<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 4: Recognize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watercoolerguys.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/week-4-recognize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watercoolerguys.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/week-4-recognize/</link>
	<description>The Sports Guys Who Talk About Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:43:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thav916</title>
		<link>http://watercoolerguys.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/week-4-recognize/#comment-1835</link>
		<dc:creator>thav916</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 22:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watercoolerguys.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/week-4-recognize/#comment-1835</guid>
		<description>Time to throw in some thav 2 cents.  This is not nitpicking as much as it is trying to make this league the best it can possibly be.  It&#039;s not my fault I&#039;m the Urban Meyer of Fantasy Sports and Innovations.  

I was looking over my team and realized that I have a ton of guys that are off in week 13, or championship week.  It&#039;s not like I have players from schools no one else is using, so I&#039;m guessing this would be aproblem for all 8 of us.  

At first, I thought, &quot;We should have the 11 game schedule, then just have the top 2 teams play in the &#039;BCS&#039; Championship game.  It&#039;d be like College Football and it would end in week 12.  Could throw 150 to the champ, 50 to 2nd place.&quot;   While I do really really like this in an 8 team college football league, I realize that some people might not like the idea of someone 3-0 suggesting this idea.  I would never suggest something to personally benefit myself but I understand. 

So then I thought more and realized the 11 game schedule meant playing every team in your division twice, every opponent in the other division once except one of them you&#039;d play twice.  That&#039;s 6 division games and 5 non-division games.  If we stick to this, since it&#039;s not really unbalanced I think the top 4 overall should advance, not simply 2 from each division.  But my proposal actually works out a few ways.  I think we should drop the 11th week where we play a non-division foe.  10 week regular season.  6 Division Games, 4 Non-Division Games.  Keep what Wells said, with 2 teams from each Division making the 4 team playoff.  Playoffs are in Weeks 11 and 12.  

I think that really works out well for everyone and everything we&#039;re doing.  

I also propose that if we keep to 4 teams making playoffs, we adjust Wells&#039;s payouts just slightly, and have them at $125 for the champ, $25 for runner-up, and $25 to each division winner.  I know not a big difference between 20 and 25, but I like the idea of that type of payout being the ole &quot;your money back.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to throw in some thav 2 cents.  This is not nitpicking as much as it is trying to make this league the best it can possibly be.  It&#8217;s not my fault I&#8217;m the Urban Meyer of Fantasy Sports and Innovations.  </p>
<p>I was looking over my team and realized that I have a ton of guys that are off in week 13, or championship week.  It&#8217;s not like I have players from schools no one else is using, so I&#8217;m guessing this would be aproblem for all 8 of us.  </p>
<p>At first, I thought, &#8220;We should have the 11 game schedule, then just have the top 2 teams play in the &#8216;BCS&#8217; Championship game.  It&#8217;d be like College Football and it would end in week 12.  Could throw 150 to the champ, 50 to 2nd place.&#8221;   While I do really really like this in an 8 team college football league, I realize that some people might not like the idea of someone 3-0 suggesting this idea.  I would never suggest something to personally benefit myself but I understand. </p>
<p>So then I thought more and realized the 11 game schedule meant playing every team in your division twice, every opponent in the other division once except one of them you&#8217;d play twice.  That&#8217;s 6 division games and 5 non-division games.  If we stick to this, since it&#8217;s not really unbalanced I think the top 4 overall should advance, not simply 2 from each division.  But my proposal actually works out a few ways.  I think we should drop the 11th week where we play a non-division foe.  10 week regular season.  6 Division Games, 4 Non-Division Games.  Keep what Wells said, with 2 teams from each Division making the 4 team playoff.  Playoffs are in Weeks 11 and 12.  </p>
<p>I think that really works out well for everyone and everything we&#8217;re doing.  </p>
<p>I also propose that if we keep to 4 teams making playoffs, we adjust Wells&#8217;s payouts just slightly, and have them at $125 for the champ, $25 for runner-up, and $25 to each division winner.  I know not a big difference between 20 and 25, but I like the idea of that type of payout being the ole &#8220;your money back.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
